Quadro 3000M vs RTX A500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
432
RTX A500 Embedded
+1165%
5468
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
16
240
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
20W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
GA107S
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
