Quadro 3000M vs Radeon Instinct MI250
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
13072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
432
Radeon Instinct MI250
+10376%
45260
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
208
5
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
13312
40
TMUs
832
32
ROPs
0
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
Aldebaran
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Fermi
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
