Quadro 3000M vs A10M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
A10M 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
6928 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
432
A10M
+5325%
23440
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
56
240
Shading Units
7168
40
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
GA102
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
