Quadro 3000M vs Quadro FX 4700 X2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 226W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
+12%
432
Quadro FX 4700 X2
384
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Apr 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
625 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
16
240
Shading Units
128
40
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
226W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
G92
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
G92-880-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
