Opteron X2 170 vs EPYC Embedded 8434P
We compared two server CPUs: Opteron X2 170 with 2 cores 2GHz and EPYC Embedded 8434P with 48 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Opteron X2 170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (110W vs 200W)
EPYC Embedded 8434P 's Advantages
Released 19 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 400)
Higher base frequency (2.5GHz vs 2GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 90nm)
Score
General Parameters
Aug 2005
Release Date
Oct 2024
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Denmark
Core Architecture
Siena
AMD Socket 939
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Opteron X2 (Denmark)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Package
0.233 billions
Transistor Count
35.5 billions
90 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
110 W
Power Consumption
200 W
65 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
-
Foundry
TSMC
199 mm²
Die Size
4x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
2
Total Core Count
48
2
Total Thread Count
96
200 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
10.0
Multiplier
25.0
128 KB
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR1-400
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
2
Max Memory Channels
6
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
96
