Iris Graphics 5100 vs GeForce 320M Mac Edition
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Graphics 5100 and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Graphics 5100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1100MHz
272 additional rendering cores
GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 30W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Graphics 5100
+673%
704
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
91
Graphics Card
May 2013
Release Date
Apr 2010
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
320
Shading Units
48
40
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
44.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
704.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
176.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
23W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Haswell GT3
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89
Generation 7.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
-
22 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.3 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
181 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.0
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
