Intel Xeon E5 1620 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3451
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 1620 with 4 cores 3.6GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 3451 with 16 cores 2.15GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon E5 1620 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 2.15GHz)
AMD EPYC Embedded 3451 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (2666 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (32MB vs 10MB)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 32nm)
Lower TDP (100W vs 130W)
Score
General Parameters
Mar 2012
Release Date
Feb 2018
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Sandy Bridge-E
Core Architecture
Zen
Intel Socket 2011
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Sandy Bridge-E)
Generation
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Package
1.27 billions
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
32 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
130 W
Power Consumption
100 W
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
294 mm²
Die Size
2x213 mm²
CPU Performance
3.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.15 GHz
3.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
4
Total Core Count
16
8
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
36.0
Multiplier
21.5
64 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
10 MB shared
L3 Cache
32 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR3
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
4
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
3
-
PCIe Lanes
64
