Intel Xeon E5 1620 vs EPYC 4564P
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 1620 with 4 cores 3.6GHz and EPYC 4564P with 16 cores 4.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon E5 1620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 170W)
EPYC 4564P 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 3)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (4.5GHz vs 3.6GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 10MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 32nm)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon E5 1620
690
EPYC 4564P
+254%
2445
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E5 1620
2533
EPYC 4564P
+504%
15303
General Parameters
Mar 2012
Release Date
May 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Sandy Bridge-E
Core Architecture
Raphael
Intel Socket 2011
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Graphics
Xeon E5 (Sandy Bridge-E)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Raphael))
Package
1.27 billions
Transistor Count
13.14 billions
32 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
130 W
Power Consumption
170 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
294 mm²
Die Size
2x71 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
122 mm²
CPU Performance
3.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
4.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
4
Total Core Count
16
8
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
36.0
Multiplier
45.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
10 MB shared
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR3
Memory Types
DDR5-5200
4
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
28
