Google Tensor G3 vs Unisoc Tiger T615
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 9 cores 2910MHz Google Tensor G3 vs. 8 cores 1800MHz Unisoc Tiger T615 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
Google Tensor G3 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (2.4158 TFLOPS vs 0.1088 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (2910MHz vs 1800MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 12nm)
Unisoc Tiger T615 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Score
Benchmark
AnTuTu 10
Google Tensor G3
+291%
1016809
Unisoc Tiger T615
259833
FP32 (float)
Google Tensor G3
+2136%
2415
Unisoc Tiger T615
108
CPU
1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X3
4x 2.37 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55
2910 MHz
Frequency
1800 MHz
9
Cores
8
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
4 nm
Process
12 nm
4.7 W
TDP
-
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
Graphics
Mali-G715 MP7
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP1
890 MHz
GPU frequency
850 MHz
7
Execution units
-
192
Shading units
64
16
Max size
12
2.4158 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.1088 TFLOPS
-
Vulkan version
1.3
-
OpenCL version
2.0
Memory
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
-
Memory frequency
1866 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Bus
2x 16 Bit
Multimedia (ISP)
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
No
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
2160 x 1080
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
1K at 60FPS
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
Yes
5G support
No
Up to 7300 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
Up to 3700 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 150 Mbps
7
Wi-Fi
5
5.3
Bluetooth
5.2
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
