Google Tensor G3 vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 9 cores 2910MHz Google Tensor G3 vs. 8 cores 2120MHz HiSilicon Kirin 655 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
Google Tensor G3 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (2.4158 TFLOPS vs 0.0576 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (2910MHz vs 2120MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 16nm)
Lower TDP (4.7W vs 5W)
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Google Tensor G3
+834%
1767
HiSilicon Kirin 655
189
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Google Tensor G3
+545%
4477
HiSilicon Kirin 655
694
FP32 (float)
Google Tensor G3
+4136%
2415
HiSilicon Kirin 655
57
CPU
1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X3
4x 2.37 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
4x 2.12 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
2910 MHz
Frequency
2120 MHz
9
Cores
8
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8-A
4 nm
Process
16 nm
-
Transistor count
4
4.7 W
TDP
5 W
Samsung
Manufacturing
-
Graphics
Mali-G715 MP7
GPU name
Mali-T830 MP2
890 MHz
GPU frequency
900 MHz
7
Execution units
2
192
Shading units
16
16
Max size
4
2.4158 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.0576 TFLOPS
-
Vulkan version
1.0
-
OpenCL version
1.2
-
DirectX version
11
Memory
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR3
-
Memory frequency
933 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Bus
2x 32 Bit
Multimedia (ISP)
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
No
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Storage type
eMMC 5.1
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
1920 x 1200
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 16MP, 2x 8MP
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
1K at 60FPS
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
Yes
5G support
No
Up to 7300 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
Up to 3700 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 50 Mbps
7
Wi-Fi
4
5.3
Bluetooth
4.1
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou
