Google Tensor G3 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 9 cores 2910MHz Google Tensor G3 vs. 8 cores 2200MHz HiSilicon Kirin 935 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
Google Tensor G3 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (2.4158 TFLOPS vs 0.087 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (2910MHz vs 2200MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 28nm)
Lower TDP (4.7W vs 7W)
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Google Tensor G3
+2675%
2415
HiSilicon Kirin 935
87
CPU
1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X3
4x 2.37 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53
2910 MHz
Frequency
2200 MHz
9
Cores
8
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8-A
-
L2 cache
512 MB
4 nm
Process
28 nm
-
Transistor count
1
4.7 W
TDP
7 W
Samsung
Manufacturing
-
Graphics
Mali-G715 MP7
GPU name
Mali-T628 MP4
890 MHz
GPU frequency
680 MHz
7
Execution units
4
192
Shading units
16
16
Max size
8
2.4158 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.087 TFLOPS
-
Vulkan version
1.0
-
OpenCL version
1.1
-
DirectX version
11
Memory
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR3
-
Memory frequency
1600 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Bus
2x 32 Bit
-
Max bandwidth
12.8 Gbit/s
Multimedia (ISP)
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
No
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.0
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
1920 x 1200
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 32MP, 2x 16MP
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 6
Yes
5G support
No
Up to 7300 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
Up to 3700 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 50 Mbps
7
Wi-Fi
5
5.3
Bluetooth
4.2
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
