GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon E9174 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9174 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Radeon E9174 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1219MHz vs 1200MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+96%
2458
Radeon E9174 MXM
1248
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Oct 2017
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
1124 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Lexa
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
E9170
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4