GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce MX550
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
GeForce MX550 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1320MHz vs 1200MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2458
GeForce MX550
+9%
2703
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+32%
3150
GeForce MX550
2375
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+226%
1429
GeForce MX550
438
Blender
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+148%
581
GeForce MX550
234
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1320 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.12 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.24 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.703 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.703 TFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
25W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
TU117
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
MX550
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
