GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (1650MHz vs 1200MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2458
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
+3%
2534
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Oct 2020
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.60 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
79.20 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.069 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.534 TFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
633.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
25W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
DG1
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
