Home Comparison GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 40.00GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
572
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 +5615%
32690

Graphics Card

Feb 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 600M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
40.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
76
384
Shading Units
9728
32
TMUs
304
8
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
150W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
AD103
N13P-GS
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net