GeForce 8400 GS PCI vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 8400 GS PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 70W)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
2808 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS PCI
22
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+54445%
12000
Graphics Card
Dec 2007
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 8
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5.328GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
22
8
Shading Units
2816
4
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.268 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
2.268 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
AD107
G98-400-U2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
