FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX 9070
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 9070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 220W)
Radeon RX 9070 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (644.6GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon RX 9070
+3513%
36130
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Mar 2025
FireStream
Generation
Navi IV
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1330 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
644.6GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
56
800
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
112
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
322.6 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
564.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
72.25 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
36.13 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1129 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
220W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 48
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT
(215-176600331)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
53.9 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
357 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
