FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
GeForce GTX 780 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce GTX 780
+315%
4156
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2013
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
2304
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GK110
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GK110-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
