Home Comparison FireGL V8650 vs RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

FireGL V8650 vs RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +5136%
23040

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
FireGL
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
320
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
AD104
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net