Home Comparison FireGL V8650 vs GeForce GT 520 PCI

FireGL V8650 vs GeForce GT 520 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 520 PCI 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650 +182%
440
GeForce GT 520 PCI
156

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Apr 2011
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

868 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
320
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
29W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GF119
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
GF119-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net