FireGL V8650 vs MTT S50
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 8GB VRAM MTT S50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
MTT S50 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
MTT S50
+1017%
4915
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Oct 2023
FireGL
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
16
-
SM Count
320
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
153.6 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
153.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.830 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.915 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
TeraScale
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
Unknown
420 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
4.0
Shader Model
6.5
