FireGL V8650 vs GeForce GT 240
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
+71%
440
GeForce GT 240
257
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Nov 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
868 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
320
Shading Units
96
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
69W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
GT215
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
