FireGL V8650 vs Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
Arc A350
+598%
3072
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireGL
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
DG2-128
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
