CMP 170HX vs RTX A4000H
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
RTX A4000H 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1560MHz vs 1410MHz)
1664 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
12630
RTX A4000H
+51%
19170
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Apr 2021
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
48
4480
Shading Units
6144
280
TMUs
192
128
ROPs
96
280
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
140W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GA104
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
GA104-???-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
7 nm
Process Size
8 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
8.6
N/A
Shader Model
6.7
