CMP 170HX vs FirePro V3750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores
FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+3488%
12630
FirePro V3750
352
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Sep 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
320
280
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
8
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
48W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
RV730
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO
(215-0719056)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.1
