Home Comparison CMP 170HX vs P104 101

CMP 170HX vs P104 101

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 4GB VRAM P104 101 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 256.3GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
P104 101 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1683MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (125W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +46%
12630
P104 101
8617

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Jan 2018
Mining GPUs
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
1506 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
256.3GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
20
4480
Shading Units
2560
280
TMUs
160
128
ROPs
64
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
107.7 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
269.3 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
134.6 GFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.617 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
269.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
125W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GP104
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
GP104-101-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
16 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
6.1
N/A
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net