CMP 170HX vs H200 NVL
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 141GB VRAM H200 NVL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 600W)
H200 NVL 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1785MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (141GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 1493GB/s)
12416 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
12630
H200 NVL
+377%
60320
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Nov 2024
Mining GPUs
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1365 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
141GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM3e
4096bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
132
4480
Shading Units
16896
280
TMUs
528
128
ROPs
24
280
Tensor Cores
528
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.84 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
942.5 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
241.3 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
60.32 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.16 TFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
600W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GH100
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
80 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
9.0
N/A
Shader Model
N/A
