CMP 170HX vs FirePro V8800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores
FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (208W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+378%
12630
FirePro V8800
2640
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
1600
280
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
208W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Cypress
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.0