CMP 170HX vs Radeon RX 5300 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (1845MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+143%
12630
Radeon RX 5300 XT
5196
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Oct 2019
Mining GPUs
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1670 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
22
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
1408
280
TMUs
88
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Navi 14
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
7 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5