AMD EPYC 9475F vs AMD EPYC 9174F
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9475F with 48 cores 3.65GHz and AMD EPYC 9174F with 16 cores 4.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9475F 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 4800)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 5nm)
AMD EPYC 9174F 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (4.1GHz vs 3.65GHz)
Lower TDP (320W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC 9475F
1692
AMD EPYC 9174F
+36%
2311
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC 9475F
13246
AMD EPYC 9174F
13296
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
Nov 2022
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Genoa
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Package
66.52 billions
Transistor Count
52.56 billions
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
400 W
Power Consumption
320 W
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
8x70.6 mm²
Die Size
8x72 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
6 nm
mm²
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
48
Performance Cores
-
96
Performance Core Threads
-
3.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
4.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
48
Total Core Count
16
96
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
36.5
Multiplier
41.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
12
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
