AMD EPYC 9475F vs AMD EPYC 8124PN
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9475F with 48 cores 3.65GHz and AMD EPYC 8124PN with 16 cores 2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9475F 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 4800)
Higher base frequency (3.65GHz vs 2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 64MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 5nm)
AMD EPYC 8124PN 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 400W)
Score
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
Sep 2023
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Siena
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))
Package
66.52 billions
Transistor Count
17.75 billions
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
400 W
Power Consumption
100 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
85 °C
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
8x70.6 mm²
Die Size
2x73 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
6 nm
mm²
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
48
Performance Cores
-
96
Performance Core Threads
-
3.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2 GHz
4.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
48
Total Core Count
16
96
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
36.5
Multiplier
20.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
6
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
