A10G vs Quadro 2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM A10G and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
A10G 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
9024 additional rendering cores
Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A10G
+7369%
31520
Quadro 2000M
422
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1320 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
4
9216
Shading Units
192
288
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
164.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
492.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
31.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
985.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GF106
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
