A10G vs Quadro P3200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM A10G and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
A10G 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1710MHz vs 1404MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
7424 additional rendering cores
Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A10G
+526%
31520
Quadro P3200 Max Q
5032
Blender
A10G
+804%
3589
Quadro P3200 Max Q
397
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1320 MHz
Base Clock
1139 MHz
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
14
9216
Shading Units
1792
288
TMUs
112
96
ROPs
64
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
164.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
492.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
31.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
31.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
985.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GP104
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
