A10G vs Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM A10G and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
A10G 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
9024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A10G
+6722%
31520
Quadro CX
462
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1320 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
24
9216
Shading Units
192
288
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
24
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
Theoretical Performance
164.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
492.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
31.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
985.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GT200B
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
