3D Rage IIC PCI vs T400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
T400 's Advantages
Released 24 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
May 2021
Rage 2
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
2GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
6
-
Shading Units
384
1
TMUs
24
1
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
TU117
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
Turing
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
-
Shader Model
6.6
