Home Comparison 3D Rage IIC PCI vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation

3D Rage IIC PCI vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 26 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

Apr 1997
Release Date
Aug 2023
Rage 2
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2MB
Memory Size
20GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
160bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
48
-
Shading Units
6144
1
TMUs
192
1
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Rage IIC
GPU Name
AD104
Rage IIC PCI (215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

5.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
-
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net