3D Rage IIC PCI vs Radeon R9 Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Aug 2015
Rage 2
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
4GB
SDR
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
Shading Units
4096
1
TMUs
256
1
ROPs
64
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
Fiji
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA
(215-0862120)
Rage 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
Shader Model
6.3
