3D Rage IIC PCI vs P102 100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 5GB VRAM P102 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
P102 100 's Advantages
Released 20 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1683MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Feb 2018
Rage 2
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1582 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
1376 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
5GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR5X
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
440.3GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
25
-
Shading Units
3200
1
TMUs
200
1
ROPs
80
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
0 MB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.6 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
168.3 GFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
10.77 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
336.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
GP102
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
GP102-100-A1
Rage 2
Architecture
Pascal
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
-
Shader Model
6.4
