3D Rage IIC PCI vs FirePro W600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro W600 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Jun 2012
Rage 2
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
2GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
-
Shading Units
512
1
TMUs
32
1
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Rage 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
Shader Model
5.1
