3D Rage IIC PCI vs GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (40.06GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
May 2013
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x8
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
1024MB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
40.06GB/s
Render Config
-
Shading Units
384
1
TMUs
32
1
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.368 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.47 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
803.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
33.47 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
49W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
GK208
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
GK208-400-A1
Rage 2
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
-
Shader Model
5.1
