3D Rage IIC PCI vs GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (9.600GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Jun 2012
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
128MB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
-
Shading Units
16
1
TMUs
8
1
ROPs
4
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
GT218
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Rage 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
-
Shader Model
4.1
