3D Rage IIC PCI vs GeForce 9600 GSO
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 384MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 9600 GSO 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
More VRAM (384GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (38.40GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Apr 2008
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
384MB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
12
-
Shading Units
96
1
TMUs
48
1
ROPs
12
-
L2 Cache
48 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.40 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
264.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
84W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
G92
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
Tesla
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
-
Shader Model
4.0
