3D Rage IIC PCI vs GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (640GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Nov 2007
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
640MB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
-
Shading Units
112
1
TMUs
28
1
ROPs
20
-
L2 Cache
80 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
G80
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
Rage 2
Architecture
Tesla
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
-
Shader Model
4.0
