3D Rage IIC PCI vs FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
More VRAM (512GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Apr 2010
Rage 2
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
512MB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
-
Shading Units
80
1
TMUs
8
1
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
17W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
Cedar
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Rage 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
Shader Model
5.0
