3D Rage IIC PCI vs FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (256GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (6.400GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
40 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Jan 2009
Rage 2
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
256MB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
-
Shading Units
40
1
TMUs
4
1
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x VHDCI
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
RV620
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
Rage 2
Architecture
TeraScale
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
Shader Model
4.1
