Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla X2090 +215%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
128
64
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy