Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA RTX A5500

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA RTX A5500

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 +766%
34.1 TFLOPS
Blender
Tesla K20Xm
372
RTX A5500 +1272%
5105
OctaneBench
Tesla K20Xm
63
RTX A5500 +846%
596
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Mar 2022
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1080 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
2688
Shading Units
10240
224
TMUs
320
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
230W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy