Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (1215MHz vs 924MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded +656%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
823 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
924 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

46
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
5888
Shading Units
1024
184
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.57 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.14 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.892 TFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.14 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy