Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M4150

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M4150

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +578%
3.723 TFLOPS
FirePro M4150
0.549 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Oct 2013
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
6
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.720 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.16 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
549.1 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.32 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Opal
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy