Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 6300M

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 6300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 6300M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 146% (2400MHz vs 975MHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition
1.997 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6300M +84%
3.686 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
Crystal System
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
12
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
76.80 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
115.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.373 TFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.686 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
230.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Navi 24
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XML
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy